A “transparent” government means many things to many people. Here are some more words that people can have long heated discussions about without ever realizing they are talking about different issues: development, growth, fairness, progress, collaboration, bureaucracy, etc. Mostly “transparency” means people want to know what is going on, what’s up for decision and how to participate in the decision-making process.
For some, transparent government only means following the letter of the law – open and noticed meetings, agendas, minutes, and records done properly so that you can access past decisions and documents, public disclosure of conflicts of interest, etc.
But there is a more foundational aspect to “transparency” that people want – to be involved, to be valued and to be heard. People don’t want to just react to already set future plans, but be in on the planning from the idea stage. They want to be included and they want ownership in their community’s future. Government has been changing the way it does business to accommodate those very democratic desires. I’ve devoted my career to making sure all community members have access to the process in a way that informs decision-makers and helps the community make better decisions.
The Orton Foundation finds that: “Inclusive, open governments are ones that encourage community members to fully understand and participate in governance and decision making. To accomplish this, they work to build and maintain strong relationships with community members, communicate and share information regularly, and reach out to citizens whose voices are not normally heard. Open governments promote transparent procedures so that residents know how things work, what to expect, and when to weigh in. Inclusive, open governments know that trust and transparency makes them more effective, and that engaging residents and tapping into local wisdom expands their capacity to solve problems and get things done.”
“As community challenges become more complex, as public budgets become smaller, and as pubic trust and good will for government become less generous, local governments are learning that a cooperative, transparent approach is more effective and efficient than an executive, closed-door approach.”
A government that works through collaborative leadership, builds trust, leverages the good will and skills of the community, draws on their unique knowledge and experience, and builds future capacity by bringing people into the process may be able to deliver amenities and services more effectively and with the most conservative use of resources.